MAPPING RELATIONS IN RESEARCHS ABOUT POVERTY AND MIGRATION (1980-2017)
Abstract
This article presents a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) of what has been produced and discussed about the relations between poverty and migration between 1980 and 2017, in order to analyze the researcher’s main concerns, as well as the themes, periods and places of origin of the papers. The article is based on the hypothesis that, knowing the international context (using platforms such as Web of Science, Scopus and
ScienceDirect), it would be possible to evaluate, a posteriori, the production in Latin America (analyzing SciELO, LatIndex and RedALyC), with the aim of comparing the main concerns, both locally and globally. The paper aims to evaluate the main themes related to and discussed when one talks about “poverty and migration” and the relationships established between them. The results of this research show, among others, that the relationship between poverty and migration is multidimensional, multidirectional and multiscale. Two main concerns that are always present are related to socioeconomic issues and the causal link between migration and poverty (still without a clear consensus). Although, there was an exponential growth in publications after 2007, the low presence of articles that analyze the Latin-American and Brazilian realities was verified, which makes the use of local platforms (SciELO, LatIndex and RedALyC) necessary.
Keywords: Poverty and migration; Systematic mapping study; Bibliographic databases; Bibliometrics
References
ALKIRE, S.; FOSTER, J. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics. Amsterdam, v. 95, n. 7-8, p. 476-487, 2011.
BAENINGER, R. Fases e faces da migração em São Paulo. Campinas: NEPO-UNICAMP, 2012.
BANCO MUNDIAL. Introduction to poverty analysis. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2005. 218p.
BARROS-JUSTO, J. L.; CRAVERO-LEAL, A.; BENITTI, F. B. V.; et al. Systematic Mapping Protocol: The impact of using software patterns during requirements engineering activities in real-world settings. Ithaca: Cornell University Library, 2017. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.05747. Acesso em: 04 jan. 2018.
BEDI, T.; COUDOUEL, A.; SIMLER, K. Maps for Policy Making: Beyond the Obvious Targeting Applications. In: BEDI, T.; COUDOUEL, A.; SIMLER, K. (Eds.) More than a Pretty Picture: using poverty maps to design better policies and interventions. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007. p. 3-22.
BRADSHAW, J.; FINCH, N. Overlaps in dimensions of poverty. Journal of Social Policy, Cambridge, v. 32, n. 4, p. 513-525, 2003.
BRITO, F. Transição demográfica e desigualdades sociais no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, São Paulo, v. 25, n. 1, p. 5-26, 2008.
CANO, W. Novas determinações sobre as questões regional e urbana após 1980. Campinas: IE/UNICAMP, 2011. 38p. (Texto para Discussão IE/UNICAMP nº 193).
CODES, A. L. M. A trajetória do pensamento científico sobre pobreza: em direção a uma visão complexa. Brasília: IPEA, 2008. 33p. (Texto para Discussão nº 1332).
DEICHMANN, U. Geographic aspects of inequality and poverty. Roma: FAO, 1999.
EASTERLIN, R. The new age structure of poverty in America: permanent or transient? Population and Development Review, New York, v. 13, n. 2, p. 195-208, 1987.
FELLOWS, I. wordcloud: Word Clouds. R package version 2.5. 2014. Disponível em: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wordcloud. Acesso em: 08 jan. 2018.
FERREIRA, F. H. G.; LANJOUW, P.; NERI, M. A robust poverty profile for Brazil using multiple data sources. Revista Brasileira de Economia, Rio de Janeiro, v. 57, n. 1, p. 59-92, 2003.
FOSTER, J.; GREER, J.; THORBECKE, E. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, Malden, v. 52, n. 4, p. 761-767, 1984.
GOUGH, D.; THOMAS, J. Commonality and diversity in reviews. In: GOUGH, David; OLIVER, Sandy; THOMAS, James (Orgs.) An introduction to systematic reviews. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2012. p. 35-65.
HADDAWAY, N. R.; BERNES, C.; JONSSON, B.; et al. The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management. Ambio – A Journal of the Human Environment, Stockholm, v. 45, n. 5, p. 613-620, 2016.
HAGENAARS, A.; DE VOS, K. The Definition and Measurement of Poverty. The Journal of Human Resources, Madison, v. 23, n. 2, p. 211-221, 1988.
HAGENAARS, A.; VAN PRAAG, B. M. S. A synthesis of poverty line definitions. Review of Income and Wealth, Ottawa, V. 31, n. 2, p. 139-154, 1985.
HEINZ, M. Systematic Mapping Studies. Mainz: Universität Koblenz-Landau, 2014. Disponível em: https://userpages.uni-koblenz.de/~laemmel/esecourse/slides/sms.pdf. Acesso em: 11 fev. 2017.
HENNINGER, N.; SNEL, M. Where are the poor? Experiences with the development and use of poverty maps. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 2002.
HOFFMANN, R. Distribuição de renda – medidas de desigualdade e pobreza. São Paulo: UdUSP, 1998. 285p.
KITCHENHAM, B.; CHARTERS, S. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Version 2.3. Keele; Durham: Keele University; University of Durham, 2007. 65p. (EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01).
KOTHARI, U. Migration and chronic poverty. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, 2002. 32p. (Chronic Poverty Research Center - WP 16).
LIPTON, M.. Demography and poverty. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1983. 127p. (World Bank Staff Working Papers nº 623).
MARIA, P. F.; BAENINGER, R. Migração e pobreza: primeiras aproximações para o Brasil (1995-2014). In: SEMINÁRIO E PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS, 11., 2016, Londrina. Anais… São Paulo: Blucher, 2016.
MARTINE, G. A globalização inacabada: migrações internacionais e pobreza no século 21. São Paulo em Perspectiva, São Paulo, v. 19, n. 3, p. 3-22, 2005.
MEDEIROS, C. N.; PINHO NETO, V. R. Os determinantes da pobreza extrema no Estado do Ceará – 2010. Fortaleza: IPECE, 2011. 45p. (Texto para Discussão nº 97).
NARAYAN, D.; PATEL, R.; SCHAFFT, K.; et al. Voices of the Poor: can anyone hear us? Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2000. 360p.
PATARRA, N. L. Migrações internacionais: teorias, políticas e movimentos sociais. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo, v. 20, n. 57, p. 7-24, 2006.
PETERSEN, K.; VAKKALANKA, S.; KUZNIARZ, L. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: an update. Information and Software Technology, Amsterdam, v. 64, p. 1-18, 2015.
ROCHA, S. Estimação de linhas de indigência e pobreza: opções metodológicas no Brasil. In: HENRIQUES, R. (Org.) Desigualdade e pobreza no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA, 2000.
ROCHA, S. Do consumo observado à linha de pobreza. Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico, Rio de Janeiro, v. 27, n. 2, p. 313-352, 1997.
ROCHA, S. Poverty under inflation. In: ØYEN, E.; MILLER, S. M.; SAMAD, S. A. (Eds.) Poverty – a global review: Handbook on International Poverty Research. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1996.
SEN, A. K. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 384p.
SEN, A. K. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985. 130p.
SIDDIQUI, T. Impact of migration on poverty and development. Brighton: University of Sussex, 2012. 44p. (“Migrating out of Poverty” Research Programme Consortium – Working Paper 2).
SOARES, S. S. D. Metodologias para estabelecer a linha de pobreza: objetivas, subjetivas, relativas, multidimensionais. Brasília: IPEA, 2009. 53p. (Texto para Discussão nº 1381).
VAINER, C. B. Estado e Migração no Brasil: da imigração à emigração. In: PATARRA, Neide Lopes (Coord.) Emigração e imigração no Brasil contemporâneo. São Paulo: FNUAP, 1995. p. 39-52.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant MERCATOR the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Free Access).
- Authors are responsible for the content of the manuscript published in the journal.