CONTROVERSIES AND TRANSITIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Abstract

Science does not progress without controversy as well the societies. In this article, this approach is privileged, aiming to analyze whether they can hinder or speed up the agricultural and food, environmental and sanitary transitions necessary to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It begins with an alert to the past development model and the limits of the planet, highlighting some themes and forms of action chosen by international institutions and / or scientist’s networks. Then, we selected some controversies and their arguments, related to environmental issues and the evolution of food systems. In the subsequent item, its actors and five sub controversies sought to highlight the difficulties for the transition to circular systems, considered as a vector of sustainability. It is concluded that controversies can block advances for transitions, being essential the design of methods, criteria and indicators for a better understanding of oppositions, as well as the need to include both themes and new approaches in research agendas.

Author Biographies

Neli de Mello Théry, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brasil

Doutora em Geographie - Universite de Paris Ouest-Nanterre-La Defense (2002) e em Geografia Humana, pela Universidade de São Paulo (2002). Desde 2008 é professor associado da Universidade de São Paulo, com livre docência sobre a tematica das terras publicas federais na Amazônia e sua relação com o meio ambiente e a gestão. E pesquisador-associado da Universidade de Brasília. Foi professor visitante na Université de Rennes II (2005) e na Université Paris Sorbonne-Nouvelle (2008). Sua experiência, na área de Geografia, abrange principalmente os seguintes temas: gestão ambiental, dinâmicas territoriais, meio ambiente e desenvolvimento sustentável, políticas ambientais, políticas territoriais, gestão urbana e ordenamento territorial, meio ambiente e políticas internacionais. É coordenadora do Grupo de Pesquisa Políticas públicas, territorialidades e sociedade do Instituto de Estudos Avançados da USP. É autora de Políticas Territoriais na Amazônia (2006) e co-autora do Atlas do Brasil - Disparidades e Dinâmicas do Território (2005, 2008) entre outros livros.

Patrick Caron, Cirad, France

Doctor, and holds a certification to direct geographical research. He is a specialist in livestock raising systems and territorial dynamics, and has worked on analyzing the role of the territory in rural transformations, with a focus on Brazil, Southern Africa and the Middle East. He has been at CIRAD since 1988 and was Deputy General Director for Research and Strategy from 2010 to 2016, Director of the Environments and Societies Department from 2007 to 2010, and Scientific Director of the Territories, Environment and Actors Department from 2001 to 2004. He is a member of a number of national and international scientific

- Copyright ID4D, https://ideas4development.org/en/auteur/patrick-caron-2/

References

CALLON M., 1986. Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction. La domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques dans la Baie de Saint-Brieuc, l’Année sociologique 36.

CARON, P., FERRERO y de Loma-Osorio, G., NABARRO, D., HAINZELIN, E., GUILLOU et al. 2018. Food systems for sustainable development: Proposals for a profound four-part transformation. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 38(4).

CARON P., 2020. From crisis to utopia: crafting new public–private articulation at territorial level to design sustainable food systems. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10065-1

CENTRO DE GESTÃO E ESTUDOS ESTRATÉGICOS. 2012. Economia verde para o desenvolvimento sustentável. Brasília, Distrito Federal.

CHEVALLIER-LE GUYADER M.-F., GIREL M., 2015. Polémique, débat et controverse : retour sur une notion. In: Au coeur des controverses. Des sciences à l’action. © ACTES SUD/IHEST, 240 p. ISBN 978-2-330-05713-8.

DE BOER J.M., Van Ittersum M., 2018. Circularity in agricultural production. Mansholt lecture, Brussels, 2018. https://www.wur.nl/upload_mm/7/5/5/14119893-7258-45e6-b4d0-e514a8b6316a_Circularity-in-agricultural-production-20122018.pdf

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS (FAO), 2006. Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Roma,.

HERODOTE, 2015. Géopolitique de l’Agriculture. Institut Français de Géopolitique, Revue de Géographie et Géopolitique, n° 156, premier trimestre,

HERODOTE, 2008. Les enjeux de la crise alimentaire mondiale. Instituto Français de Géopolitique, Revue de Géographie et Géopolitique, n° 131, quatrième trimestre.

HENRICH BÖLL FOUNDATION. Atlas da Carne: fatos e números sobre os animais que comemos. Rio de Janeiro: Henrich Böll Foundation, 2015.

LOORBACH, D.; ROTMANS, J., 2002. Society in technology and technology in society, paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education for Sustainable Development (EESD), 24/25 October, Delft, The Netherlands.

HLPE. 2016. Sustainable agricultural development for food security and nutrition: what roles for livestock? A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. HLPE report 10. Rome. 140 pp. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5795e.pdf.

HLPE. 2017. 2nd Note on Critical and Emerging Issues for Food Security and Nutrition. A note by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/Critical-Emerging-Issues-2016/HLPE_Note-to-CFS_Critical-and-Emerging-Issues-2nd-Edition 27-April-2017.pdf

HLPE. 2019. Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. HLPE report 14. Rome. 163 pp. http://www.fao.org/3/ca5602en/ca5602en.pdf

JURGILEVICH, A.; BIRGE, T.; KENTALA-LEHTONEN, J.; KORHONEN-KURKI, K.; PIETIKÄINEN, J.; SAIKKU, L.; SCHÖSLER, H.. 2016. Transitions towards circular economy in the food system. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/1/69

LATOUR B, 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, 1987. (ISBN 0-674-79291-2)

LEMIEUX C., 2015. Logique des controverses : confinement, déconfinement, reconfinement. In: Au cœur des controverses. Des sciences à l’action. © ACTES SUD/IHEST, 240 p. ISBN 978-2-330-05713-8.)

MURPHY, S., BURCH, D., CLAPP, J. 2012. Cereal secrets. Oxford, UK, Oxfam.

MOTTET, A.; DE HAAN, C.; FALCUCCIA, A.; TEMPIO, G.; OPIO, C.; GERBER, P., 2017. Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/ food debate. Global Food Security, 14: 1-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001

PNAS. 2015. Analysis and valuation on the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change.

RASTOIN, J-L.; GHERSI, G. 2010. Concepts et méthodes, analyses et dynamiques. Versailles, Editions Quae.

REGANOLD, J. P.; WACHTER, J. 2016. Organic agriculture in the twenty-first. Nature Plants, v. 2, article number 15221. jan.

SACHS, I. 2008. La Troisième Rive, À la Recherche de l’Écodévelopement. Paris: Bourin Éditeur.

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE, Stockholm University, Dr Marco Springmann and Martin Oxford, Programme on the Future of Food and the Nuffield Department of Population Health at the University of Oxford). https://www.stockholmresilience.org/

VEIGA, J. E. da. 2014. Amago da sustentabilidade. Revista Estudos Avançados, V. 28, N° 82.

TRUFFER, B.; COENEN, L.. 2011. Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies. Studies Lecture, Version 1, 04/04/11, p. 1

THERY, H.; CARON, P.. 2019. Circulation, consommation mondiale des viandes et obésité : coïncidences ou co-incidences ?, Confins [En ligne], 40 | 2019, mis en ligne le 13 juillet 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/confins/20153, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/confins.20153

UNEP. 2010. Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication - a synthesis for policy makers. Disponível em www.unep.org/greeneconom.

WILLETT W, ROCKSTRO M.J, LOKEN B, SPRINGMANN M, LANG T, VERMEULEN S. et al. 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems The Lancet; Jan. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (18)31788-4

ZUINEN, N., GOUZEE, N.. 2010. Biocapacité et empreinte écologique des modes de viwe: des indicateurs pour la politique de développement durable ? Bureau fédéral du Plan : working paper 11-10, juin.

Sites :
https://www.footprintnetwork.org/

http://www.foodpolicymilano.org/milan-urban-food-policy-pact/#:~:text=Il%20Milan%20Urban%20Food%20Policy%20Pact%20%C3%A8%20un,abitano%20e%20lavorano%20oltre%20470%20milioni%20di%20persone

https://glad.umd.edu/projects/global-forest-watch

http://www.inpe.br

htpp://www.yeldgap.org
Published
22/10/2020
How to Cite
THÉRY, Neli de Mello; CARON, Patrick. CONTROVERSIES AND TRANSITIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Mercator, Fortaleza, v. 19, oct. 2020. ISSN 1984-2201. Available at: <http://www.mercator.ufc.br/mercator/article/view/e19027>. Date accessed: 06 mar. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.4215/rm2020.e19027.
Section
ARTICLES