URBAN CRISIS AND THE ANTIVALUE IN DAVID HARVEY
revisiting Harvey
Abstract
This text discusses and explains the relation between the urban crisis today and the antivalue in respect to the conceptual framework by David Harvey, a well-known British geographer. He approaches this theme in many of his books, including ‘Marx, capital and the madness of economic reason’, published in Brazil, in 2018. This text uses this book as a starting point for the discussion of how the contemporary world, which is increasingly urban, is dominated by the Empire of antivalue, especially in the form of a growing debt. The antivalue, in the form of capital holder of interest, plays a crucial role in the accumulation of capital, articulating production, circulation and realization of commodities, promoting and facilitating the geographical movement of capital and the transfer of capital between economic circuits and cycles of production. However, debt is the favorite form of antivalue under capitalism today. In addition to being supported and granted by the State in a variety of ways, including through public debt, debt imprisons all economic agents in perpetual servitude. Debt follows the tendency of continuous production of value and surplus value under capitalism, a movement that Harvey calls bad infinity. Antivalue in its form of debt is also called fetishism of capital, which defines the contradictory situation in which money alone seems to have the magic powers to create more money. The consequences of growing debt to the urban crisis go beyond the necessity of solving fiscal problems of the State. The need to produce value and surplus value, in addition to the service of the debt generates urban spaces marked by gentrification and segregation. In sum, the text discusses the urban crisis today in the context of the domination by the financial-real estate complex, basing the discussion on Marx’s theory of value and the concept of antivalue, as presented by David Harvey.
References
HARVEY, David. The urban experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.
HARVEY, David. Social justice and the city. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993 [1973].
HARVEY, David. The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
HARVEY, David. Os limites do capital. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2013. [1982]
HARVEY, David. A loucura da razão econômica: Marx e o capital no século XXI. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2018.
MARX, Karl. Capital. A critique of political economy. Volume one. London: Penguin Books, 1990 [1867].
VALENÇA, Márcio Moraes. Cidades ingovernáveis? Ensaio sobre o pensamento harveyano acerca da urbanização do capital. IN: SILVA, José Borzacchiello da, LIMA, Luiz Cruz e ELIAS, Denise. (orgs.). Panorama da Geografia Brasileira. São Paulo: Annablume, 2006. p. 185-190.
VALENÇA, Márcio Moraes. Ensaio sobre a dinâmica do imobiliário em Harvey. IN: Márcio Moraes Valença. Cidade (i)legal. Rio de Janeiro: Mauad, 2008. p. 243-250.
VALENÇA, Márcio Moraes. Harveyan utopian thought and social justice. Approaching public space. IN: MENDES, Manuela M.; SÁ, T.; CABRAL, J. (eds.). Architecture and the social sciences. Inter- and multidisciplinary approaches between society and space. Berlin: Springer, 2017. p.86-96.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant MERCATOR the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work (see The Effect of Free Access).
- Authors are responsible for the content of the manuscript published in the journal.